Nuclear Deal

Some of you might know that I harbor a deep interest in Strategic affairs, and my area of interest has been the Indo-US relations. Given this, it is no surprising fact that I have been following the meetings that are being held on the Nuclear Deal.

At the onset itself, let me say that I believe that our PM Manmohan Singh is an honorable man, one of the few who has any credibility left, and I do not believe that he talks with a forked tongue. He may not be a great orator, but who ever writes his speeches is an intelligent and sensitive person, and his speeches are some of the best I have ever read of any PM. His speech in Oxford, though it received a lot of flack, was an excellent piece of writing and communicated some wonderful observations. Read it here.

Yesterday afternoon, he gave a speech in the Rajya Sabha, detailing out the plans for the separation of Civil and Military Nuclear assets. He laid to rest the various doubts that many people harbored and washed away all doubts from my mind about the importance and need of this process.

Some history lessons are in order. India under the leadership of Nehruvian Ideas, refused to sign the NPT, because it was discriminatory. What it said was basically that, those countries who had nuclear weapons could keep them while others who had not developed them so far, could enjoy the Civilian uses with the help of abovementioned countries, as long as they promised to not develop nuclear weapons. It was a treaty to preserve the world order as of that day. Those countries who did not sign the treaty, like India, would not be helped by the 5 Nuclear powers, towards peaceful uses of Nuclear technology. With this in mind, it a matter of great relief the Canada and Russia has helped us in building several reactors.

Unlike the US which has great reserves of Uranium, India has large reserves of Thorium, so She decided to work towards Thorium reactors. We have not made much progress on this, having reactors with the Maximum capacity of only 220Mw.

With the Economy growing at an Tremendous pace, the need of infrastructure was greater then ever before. Electric power has become one of the most needed resources in India today. India had to look at other sources of Power, and Nuclear Power came at the top of that list. It was with these needs in mind that Manmohan Singh signed that Infamous July 18th agreement.

As Dr Sings said,

As India strives to raise its annual GDP growth rate from the present 7-8% to over 10%, the energy deficit will only worsen. This may not only retard growth, it could also impose an additional burden in terms of the increased cost of importing oil and natural gas, in a scenario of sharply rising hydrocarbon prices. While we have substantial reserves of coal, excessive dependence on coal-based energy has its own implications for our environment. Nuclear technology provides a plentiful and non-polluting source of power to meet our energy needs. However, to increase the share of nuclear power in our energy mix, we need to break out of the confines imposed by inadequate reserves of natural uranium, and by international embargos that have constrained our nuclear programme for over three decades.
According to me, the greates thing to come out of this agreement is that US has acknowledged India as a Nuclear Power, and has not asked her to give up the weapons.
But more importantly, in the Joint Statement, the United States implicitly acknowledged the existence of our nuclear weapons programme. There was also public recognition that as a responsible State with advanced nuclear technologies, India should acquire the same benefits and advantages as other States which have advanced nuclear technology, such as the United States. The Joint Statement offered the possibility of decades-old restrictions being set aside to create space for India'’s emergence as a full member of a new nuclear world order.
For India to get Nuclear fuel as well as the expertise she needs, all she had to do was separate her Civil and Military installations. The Civil installations would be under IAEA safeguard, while India could do what she wanted at the military sites. Even the choice of marking a site as Civil or Military lay with India. As the PM said,
We have ensured that our three-stage nuclear programme will not be undermined or hindered by external interference. We will offer to place under safeguards only those facilities that can be identified as civilian without damaging our deterrence potential or restricting our R&D effort, or in any way compromising our autonomy of developing our three stage nuclear programme.
Neither have our strategic interestss been harmed. Unlike what some people believe,
nothing that could compromise our nuclear deterrent has been shared with anyone.
I believe that this deal, when it goes through, will be one of the best things that could happen for India. She will be helped in building more reactors, thus generating more power, while being allowed to keep her weapons.

Some people believe that the US will not keep her part of the deal, coz this deal will not be passed by Congress. To them I will only say, that the Bush presidency has had an excellent history of passing legislation thru Congress, which neither the Democrats nor the Republicans wanted. Getting this bill passed is the work of Bush, and if Congress does not pass this deal, we have Bush to blame.

Improv Everywhere

There is this great site that I keep track of. There are a bunch of actors in New York who's aim are to improvise everwhere. They make funny scenes in public, and act calm all through out. Their McDonald's Bathroom Attendant was what had bought me to their site and I am hooked since.

Imagin you see a man trying to commit suicide by jumping from a ledge. His wife and co-workers come and try to dissuade him. Wouldn't you stop to look at it. What would happen if a fire man comes and brings along a trampolin for the guy to jump on to safely? and he does jump. Wouldn't there be a crowd waiting and cheering ? And what would happen if the ledge happend to be just 4 feet from the ground? To know more go to:
Suicide Jumper

But they have outdone themselves this time. I have often wonderd what would happen if all the phones in the train compartment started ringing all the time? And what if the phones were at a place where there was no one to answer them? See thier great prank at : Cell Phone Symphony

Top Gear

I just finished watching the Winter Olympic special of Top Gear. For those who have no idea what Top Gear is, I'll say you are missing one of the best shows on the Telly.

Top Gear is presented by three blokes, Jeremy Clarkson, James May and Richard Hammond. They review cars in their inimitable style, sometimes even reducing cars to 'rubble via a series of trials, stunts and bizarre behavior'.

I just love the way they pass the cars thru these stupid tests, spending a lot of money on every review. Here You can see them testing a car on the HMS invincible. Not only is it technically perfect, but aesthetically too.

Top Gear has had a history of playing a role in factoring the sales of some cars. If a car is disliked by the presenters, such as in the case of the Vauxhall Vectra, it can have a tendency to adversely affect sales. Top Gear is estimated to have over 350 million viewers worldwide.


In this weeks show, they make cars run on ice, race against a professional speed skater, play Ice hockey, even make a Mini do the Ski Jump.

For those of you who missed it, and have got a broadband connection, you can look at two segments:

1]Playing Ice Hockey with the Suzuki Swift:




2]The Mini doing a Ski Jump:
You should just look at James 'Captain Slow' May speaking eloquently about Trajectory and gravity

The Namesake

As you can see, I have been busy, after the end of the prelims. This template took me a long time to make, coz I had to start from scratch. A whole day spent [Not wasted]. If you really want to see the blog in all its splendor. switch to Firefox, coz IE will have some trouble with a few tags I have used.

After the exams, instead of studying I have been behaving like it were a vacation. Have already seen 4 movies, got my cycle cleaned, and read a really nice book.

'The Namesake' written by Jhumpa Lahiri, is one of the best books I have read in a very long time. The protagonist of the story is an Bengali ABCD born in the late 60's. His parents refuse to give him a proper name at birth, coz his great-grand mother wanted to name him and had sent a letter with her choice, but the letter never reaches its destination. The father calls him by the name of Gogol, his favorite Russian author. The kid begins to hate the name in school and finally changes it to Nikhil when he turns 18. How he struggles with his identity, form the basis of the story.

I have always been an anti-goat when it comes to reading novels. If a novel is popular, I suffer from the pressure of liking it, and most often I cant get myself to read it. That's the reason why I haven't read 'The God of Small Things' yet. This is also might be the reason why I cant finish reading a single page of Ayn Rand. I would rather pick up some obscure novel, which I had never heard of, and read it, rather then some novel whos author has had realms of newsprint written about him or her.

So when I had picked up Jhumpa Lahiri's 'Interpreter of Maladies' I was sure that I wouldn't last more then one story. Her name had cropped up all over the media 4 years ago, after she got the Pulitzer Prize. I was rather surprised when I liked her stories. Her slow style of narration hypnotised me.

Yesterday while doing nothing in particular, I chanced to find her novel: The Namesake. After reading it for two days, I cant say why I loved it so much. I can relate to Gogol, who has doubts about himself when no one else does. I can empathise with his insecurities. I feel the 'I am different' that he does.

But Lahiri's way of writing is something totally different. You are with the character, but not the character. So you can actually see the character as another person close to you; You don't try to imagine yourself to be in his or her shoes, because you have gone thru all those fictional situations along with them. It's like this: If you are in a particular situation, you know what you will do, but if your friend is in that situation, you don't think, you just empathise with him. Maybe this is why the book affected me so deeply and touched a chord somewhere.

Ms: Not a good Vista


Geeks the world over hate Microsoft, not because of Jelousy regarding Bill's enormous wealth, but because it makes bad products. There is a common saying among the geekdome:

The only Microsoft product that will not suck is a Vacume Cleaner.

You all have had problems with Microsoft's idiosyncrasies, be it with Ms Word or any of its Os's. It has been almost 4yrs after WinXp came out, and yet it cannot be called Stable. Microsoft claims that its new Os, Vista will be much better, but only a fool will believe them. However this post is not about the comparison of Vista with Xp. Its about upgrading your computer to Vista. Will people welcome Vista with open Arms? I don't think so. Why?

Read the following article on Bit-Tech
Vista is a hardware beast

A Tech Strategist within Microsoft, Nigel Page, has gone on record to discuss the hardware requirements for Windows Vista, due out next Christmas.

What he's said is kind of shocking.

System breakdown


Graphics: Vista has changed from using the CPU to display bitmaps on the screen to using the GPU to render vectors. This means the entire display model in Vista has changed. To render the screen in the GPU requires an awful lot of memory to do optimally - 256MB is a happy medium, but you'll actually see benefit from more. Microsoft believes that you're going to see the amount of video memory being shipped on cards hurtle up when Vista ships.

CPU: Threading is the main target for Vista. Currently, very little of Windows XP is threaded - the target is to make Vista perform far better on dual-core and multi-core processors.

RAM: 2GB is the ideal configuration for 64-bit Vista, we're told. Vista 32-bit will work ideally at 1GB, and minimum 512. However, since 64-bit is handling data chunks that are double the size, you'll need double the memory, hence the 2GB. Nigel mentions DDR3 - which is a little odd, since the roadmap for DDR3, on Intel gear at least, doesn't really kick in until 2007.

HDD: SATA is definitely the way forward for Vista, due, Microsoft tells us, to Native Command Queueing. NCQ allows for out of order completions - that is, if Vista needs tasks 1,2,3,4 and 5 done, it can do them in the order 2,5,3,4,1 if that's a more efficient route for the hard drive head to take over the disk. This leads to far faster completion times. NCQ is supported on SATA2 drives, so expect them to start becoming the standard sooner rather than later. Microsoft thinks that these features will provide SCSI-level performance.

Bus: AGP is 'not optimal' for Vista. Because of the fact that graphics cards may have to utilise main system memory for some rendering tasks, a fast, bi-direction bus is needed - that's PCI express.

Display: Prepare to feel the red mist of rage - no current TFT monitor out there is going to support high definition playback in Vista. You may already have heard rumblings about this, but here it is. To play HD-DVD or Blu-Ray content you need a HDCP compatible monitor. Why? Because these formats use HDCP to encrypt a video signal as it travels along a digital connection to an output device, to prevent people copying it. If you have just standard DVI or even an analogue output, you're going to see HD scaled down to a far-less-than-HD resolution for viewing - which sucks. This isn't really Microsoft's fault - HDCP is something that content makers, in their eternal wisdom, have decided is necessary to stop us all watching pirated movies. Yay.

Thoughts


Amusingly, Page admits that there are no monitors out there that will do HDCP, and that this is a problem. Frankly, it's the consumer's problem, however, according to him. "It's up to you [the users] to say, 'Where's my HDCP?'"

I'm more inclined to say to Hollywood 'Hey, STFU' to be honest.

One of the major problems is that Hollywood knows that Microsoft dominates the operating system sphere, and so it can arm-wrestle MS into working with it. If there was more competition, Hollywood would have to be a little more cautious about what it tries to get away with.

We come back to the age-old problem. Content is being forced onto us that is, to all extents and purposes, crippled. It's not like any of this stuff is actually going to make any difference - we're still going to have dodgy films on the net, probably in no less quantity than we have now - so why would be pay to be screwed, when we can just get an uncrippled version for free?

But, that's a little off topic. In terms of the hardware stuff, it seems obvious that hardware makers are rubbing their hands in glee. It's been hard to persuade people to upgrade their WinXP boxes, since they can handle pretty much anything thrown at them, unless you're a gamer. Graphics companies are going to be selling a bucket-load more GPUs, since now practically every system sold for Vista is going to need one. It's no coincidence that Nvidia is re-introducing onboard graphics for its motherboards very soon.

2GB of RAM for high-end systems is pretty chunky, and it could be that we start to see RAM prices go up as suddenly, a big percentage of systems are being built with 4 times the current requirement. If you thought SATA2 had been slow to take off, expect every new enthusiast chipset to have it built in next year, and for drive makers to start shifting over to it quick - if they're not building a huge number of NCQ drives by the middle of next year, they risk missing out on loads of orders come Vista.


For the complete interview go to APCStart.com.

Cricket for the Uninitiated

Some people find the game of cricket diffficult to understand.
Perhaps the following will help:

The game is played by two groups.

The first group is in and the second group goes out.

Some of the group which is in, go out.

The group that is out, tries to get the group that is in, out.

When one of the group that is in, is out, he goes in and the next one goes out.

Then when all of the first group (except one) that is in, is out, the second group that is out goes in.

The first group now goes out and tries to get the second group, who now are in, out.

Only when both groups have been in and out twice is there a conclusion.

This is how the game called Cricket is played!


....From Mind Your Language!

Paheli Solved

I am so happy to hear that Paheli did not win an Oscar Nomination.
  
    Amol Plaekar, the director of this movie is a world class actor who has entertained us with his down to earth roles in Movies like Golmal, Choti si Baat, Rang Birangi and countless others. His movies as director like Daayraa, Kairee & Dhyasparva were excellent. His 'Thodasa Roomani Ho Jaayen' was a unique film with its rhyming dialogues. This continued till he started casting People from the mainstream cinema like Sonali Bendre in 'Anaahat' and SRK and Rani in 'Paheli'. I often wonder why these great parallel cinema directors start spewing such crap after they become a little successful and have Bollywood stars ready to work with them.

    SRK on another note is a person I actively dislike. He may be the media's 'Badshah' Khan as well as the most popular star overseas, but the only instance in which I can remember him acting is in 'Swades'. He is a non-actor and none of his films, neither 'Asoka' [I had heard of Ashoka, but who is this Asoka?] nor 'Paheli' are world class movies.

    The way the story of Paheli was handled was absurd to begin with. The story of a Ghost falling in love with a beautiful Girl, had a lot of potential, but it was all squandered. The movie was so (unintentionally) funny that I went berserk laughing in the theatre. The people around me were looking at me in a funny sort of way, and the girl I had gone with, began to seriously question my sanity. Next day in college, when I announced that I had seen the movie, the first thing Dustin asked me was, “So how did the Ghost get Rani Pregnant?"

    If they had nominated Paheli, all hell would have broken loose on the pages of 'Bombay Times'. They probably would have declared SRK to be 'The Greatest Actor of the Third Millennium' or something.

    Not that I am saying that India does not produce good movies which the world (America in Particular) can enjoy. I watch only English and Hindi Movies, and yet I can name at least 3 good ones.

  1] Iqbal, a story of the struggle of a deaf & dumb Boy to achieve his dream of being a member of the Cricket team, would have been universally loved. We also know that the Americans have a weakness for sports heroes.

    2] Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi, a wonderful movie about Human relationships in troubled times, ‘A clash between idealism and realism', would have been a good choice. U should watch it just for Shiney Ahuja's great acting and Chitrangada Singh, who gave a wonderful performance to steal our hearts.
  
  3] Yahaan, a sensitively made movie about love under the dark shadow of terrorism, in Kashmir was also a good movie. The American's are suckers for terrorism related movies, and we let that go!

    These 3 movies are from the commercial part of cinema. And I don't even know about Marathi or Bhojpuri or Bengali or south Indian Movies. Just makes one wonder how many great movies are made in India.

    Its High time we stop our obsession with SRK and Yash Chopra type of movies and look at the great variety that we have to offer.